Discovering "What Matters" to patients: A quality improvement project.

PURPOSE: Age-Friendly Health Systems were developed to provide an evidenced based framework to provide high-quality care to older adults. The purpose of this quality improvement initiative was to increase the completion of the "What Matters" section of the "Get to Know Me" boards. METHODS: Face-to-face training was provided to staff via individual sessions on "What Matters" to patients and how to complete the boards. Re-education continued weekly over a 15 week period. Board Completion rates were collected weekly. RESULTS: 60 nurses participated in this project. The "What Matters" completion rates increased from 27 % to 59 % over the intervention period on the SACU and 16 % to 32 % on the SIMC . CONCLUSIONS: The "Get to Know Me Boards" are a visible way to describe "What Matters" to patients. Education helped to increase the completion rate of the boards allowing for "What Matters" to be accessible to members of the healthcare team.

Mapping potentially inappropriate medications in older adults using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system.

BACKGROUND: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older adults are medications in which risks often outweigh benefits and are suggested to be avoided. Worldwide, many distinct guidelines and tools classify PIMs in older adults. Collating these guidelines and tools, mapping them to a medication classification system, and creating a crosswalk will enhance the utility of PIM guidance for research and clinical practice. METHODS: We used the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System, a hierarchical classification system, to map PIMs from eight distinct guidelines and tools (2019 Beers Criteria, Screening Tool for Older Person's Appropriate Prescriptions [STOPP], STOPP-Japan, German PRISCUS, European Union-7 Potentially Inappropriate Medication [PIM] list, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS] High-Risk Medication, Anticholinergic Burden Scale, and Drug Burden Index). Each PIM was mapped to ATC Level 5 (drug) and to ATC Level 4 (drug class). We then used the crosswalk (1) to compare PIMs and PIM drug classes across guidelines and tools to determine the number of PIMs that were index (drug-induced adverse event) or marker (treatment of drug-induced adverse event) drug of prescribing cascades, and (2) estimate the prevalence of PIM use in older adults continuously enrolled with fee-for-service Medicare in 2018 as use cases. Data visualization and descriptive statistics were used to assess guidelines and tools for both use cases. RESULTS: Out of 480 unique PIMs identified, only three medications-amitriptyline, clomipramine, and imipramine and two drug classes-N06AA (tricyclic antidepressants) and N06AB (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors), were noted in all eight guidelines and tools. Using the crosswalk, 50% of classes of index drugs and 47% of classes of marker drugs of known prescribing cascades were PIMs. Additionally, 88% of Medicare beneficiaries were dispensed ≥1 PIM across the eight guidelines and tools. CONCLUSION: We created a crosswalk of eight PIM guidelines and tools to the ATC classification system and created two use cases. Our findings could be used to expand the ease of PIM identification and harmonization for research and clinical practice purposes.

Medication use quality and safety in older adults: 2022 update.

Improving the quality of medication use and medication safety are important priorities for healthcare providers who care for older adults. The objective of this article was to identify four exemplary articles with this focus in 2022. We selected high-quality studies from an OVID search and hand searching of major high impact journals that advanced the field of research forward. The chosen articles cover domains related to deprescribing, medication safety, and optimizing medication use. The MedSafer Study, a cluster randomized clinical trial in Canada, evaluated whether patient specific deprescribing reports generated by electronic decision support software resulted in reduced adverse drug events in the 30 days post hospital discharge in older adults (domain: deprescribing). The second study, a retrospective cohort study using data from Premier Healthcare Database, examined in-hospital adverse clinical events associated with perioperative gabapentin use among older adults undergoing major surgery (domain: medication safety). The third study used an open-label parallel controlled trial in 39 Australian aged-care facilities to examine the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led intervention to reduce medication-induced deterioration and adverse reactions (domain: optimizing medication use). Lastly, the fourth study engaged experts in a Delphi method process to develop a consensus list of clinically important prescribing cascades that adversely affect older persons' health to aid clinicians to identify, prevent, and manage prescribing cascades (domain: optimizing medication use). Collectively, this review succinctly highlights pertinent topics related to promoting safe use of medications and promotes awareness of optimizing older adults' medication regimens.

Crushed Tablet Administration for Patients with Dysphagia and Enteral Feeding: Challenges and Considerations.

Dysphagia is increasingly common in older adults; it is especially prevalent in long-term care settings. Patients with dysphagia likely require pharmacologic treatment for multiple comorbidities but may find it difficult or impossible to swallow oral medications. Administering crushed medications mixed with a soft food or liquid vehicle, or via a feeding tube, is a common strategy to circumvent swallowing difficulties in patients with dysphagia. However, inappropriate medication use and improper crushing technique can reduce the medication dose a patient receives, alter medication pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and compromise treatment efficacy and patient safety. Clinical judgment is needed to identify medications that can and cannot be crushed, select a crushing methodology and vehicle for administering crushed medications, and create a strategy for administering multiple medications. A coordinated effort from the entire care team-including physicians, pharmacists, nurses, advanced practice providers, speech therapists, patients, and caregivers-is necessary to develop and implement an individualized plan for administering medications to patients with dysphagia. This review details the current literature regarding the administration of medications that have been altered, such as by crushing tablets or opening capsules, for patients with dysphagia or who are receiving enteral feeding and provides recommendations on best practices.

Dysphagia, or difficulty swallowing, is common in hospitals and in places that provide long-term care. People who live at home may also have a hard time swallowing pills. In this review, we talk about how people who have a hard time swallowing pills can best take their medicines. A speech-language pathologist can help people with dysphagia find ways to eat and drink safely. Their healthcare provider and pharmacist should make sure all their medicines are needed and check if any of their medicines come in a form that does not need to be swallowed, like a patch. It is sometimes okay to take a medicine by crushing a pill and then mixing with food. However, some medicines may be dangerous or less effective if they are crushed or mixed with some foods. Mixing multiple crushed medicines may also be unsafe or make them less effective. People in hospitals and long-term care settings who have a hard time swallowing pills should have an individual plan in place for taking medicines. Physicians, pharmacists, speech-language pathologists, and front-line care staff should work with patients and caregivers to make the plan. The plan should be written down in their patient record. People who have a hard time swallowing medicines should talk to their doctor or pharmacist about how best to take their medicines. People should not alter their medicines without talking to a healthcare professional.

Unintended impacts of a national antipsychotic reduction initiative among nursing facility residents with and without Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: In July 2012, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services launched an antipsychotic reduction initiative (ARI) to improve care for nursing facility residents with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). We examined the impact of this policy on antipsychotic and psychotropic medication (PM) utilization and diagnosis patterns in long-stay nursing facility residents with ADRD and other conditions in which antipsychotics are indicated. METHODS: Using an 80% sample of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with Part D, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of nursing facility residents with ADRD, bipolar disorder, psychosis, Parkinson's disease, and residents exempt from the policy due to diagnoses of schizophrenia, Tourette syndrome, and/or Huntington's disease. We used interrupted time-series analyses to compare changes in diagnoses, antipsychotic use, and PM utilization before (January 1, 2011-June 30, 2012) and after (July 1, 2012-September 30, 2015) ARI implementation. RESULTS: We identified 874,487 long-stay nursing facility residents with a diagnosis of ADRD (n = 358,518), exempt (n = 92,859), bipolar (n = 128,298), psychosis (n = 93,402), and Parkinson's disease (n = 80,211). In all cohorts, antipsychotic use declined prior to the ARI; upon policy implementation, antipsychotic use reductions were sustained throughout the study period, including statistically significant ARI-associated accelerated declines in all cohorts. PM changes varied by cohort, with ARI-associated increases in non-benzodiazepine sedatives and/or muscle relaxants noted in ADRD, psychosis, and Parkinson's cohorts. Although anticonvulsant use increased throughout the study period in all groups, with the exception of the bipolar cohort, these increases were not associated with ARI implementation. Findings are minimally explained by increased post-ARI membership in the psychosis and Parkinson's cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our study documents antipsychotic use significantly declined in non-ADRD clinical and exempt cohorts, where such reductions may not be clinically warranted. Furthermore, ARI-associated compensatory increases in PMs do not offset these reductions. Changes in PM utilization and diagnostic make-up of residents using PMs require further investigation to assess the potential for adverse clinical and economic outcomes.

Navigating Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer's Disease: Focusing on Medications in Phase 3 Clinical Trials.

Over the past 18 months, there has been scrutiny and controversy over the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's accelerated approval of aducanumab, a novel monoclonal antibody to treat Alzheimer's disease and prevent disease progression. As clinicians, educators, and advocates for our patients and caregivers impacted daily by this debilitating illness, this approval reinforces the need to maintain vigilance and awareness about emerging agents. The intent of the current article is to highlight some of the medications in Phase 3 clinical trials and share resources and updates on disease-modifying agents and their unique pharmacology. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 49(1), 6-10.].

Comparing risk prediction models aimed at predicting hospitalizations for adverse drug events in community dwelling older adults: a protocol paper.

Background: The objective of this paper is to describe the creation, validation, and comparison of two risk prediction modeling approaches for community-dwelling older adults to identify individuals at highest risk for adverse drug event-related hospitalizations. One approach will use traditional statistical methods, the second will use a machine learning approach. Methods: We will construct medication, clinical, health care utilization, and other variables known to be associated with adverse drug event-related hospitalizations. To create the cohort, we will include older adults (≥ 65 years of age) empaneled to a primary care physician within the Cedars-Sinai Health System primary care clinics with polypharmacy (≥ 5 medications) or at least 1 medication commonly implicated in ADEs (certain oral hypoglycemics, anti-coagulants, anti-platelets, and insulins). We will use a Fine-Gray Cox proportional hazards model for one risk modeling approach and DataRobot, a data science and analytics platform, to run and compare several widely used supervised machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes, and K-Nearest Neighbors. We will use a variety of metrics to compare model performance and to assess the risk of algorithmic bias. Discussion: In conclusion, we hope to develop a pragmatic model that can be implemented in the primary care setting to risk stratify older adults to further optimize medication management.

Examining transitions of care among nursing home residents with and without antipsychotic medication use.

OBJECTIVES: This study examines the association between antipsychotic (AP) medication use and care transitions in the nursing home (NH) population. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries between 2011 and 2015. Propensity score adjusted negative binomial regression was performed and conditional probabilities of having a first transition from the NH to specific locations were calculated. RESULTS: Among 150,284 eligible beneficiaries, the majority were female (67%), white (84%), and >75 years old (63%). Controlling for resident characteristics, the odds of having any transition was 5% lower among those with AP use [IRR (95% confidence interval (CI))=0.95(0.94-0.96)] relative to those with no AP use. Residents with AP use had higher proportions of transitions to hospital (22.7% vs. 19.5%, p < 0.01), emergency department (19.6% vs. 10.7%, p < 0.01), and different NH (1.5% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.01), and lower proportions of transition to non-healthcare locations compared to those without AP use. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate that residents with AP use had higher probabilities of transitions to more costly care settings such as the emergency department and hospital compared to those without AP use. Future longitudinal studies will help to inform clinical interventions aimed at improving the quality of care for this population.

Social determinants predict whether Medicare beneficiaries are offered a Comprehensive Medication Review.

BACKGROUND: Medication reviews through Medicare's Medication Therapy Management (MTM) program may improve patient outcomes and lower health system costs, but these effects could be limited by a program design that does not address social determinants of health. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effects of social determinants of health on the odds of an eligible Medicare beneficiary not being offered Comprehensive Medication Review (CMR). METHODS: Using the full 100% sample of the 2016 Part D Medication Therapy Management Data File linked to Medicare Master Beneficiary Summary File, a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis was conducted to determine which social and demographic variables are most strongly associated with being eligible for a CMR but not being offered one. Descriptive statistics were generated using SAS studio 3.8. RESULTS: Variables associated with the highest odds of not receiving a CMR when eligible are residence in Louisiana OR 1.79 (95%CI 1.70-1.88), receiving the LIS OR 1.76 (1.73-1.79), dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid OR 1.25 (1.12-1.41), and Black race OR 1.19 (1.16-1.21). CONCLUSIONS: Social determinants of health, most strongly geography and low-income status, predict being eligible for but not being offered CMR. Race continues to be a factor in disparate access to MTM services.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors: Risks vs. Rewards When Caring for Older Adults.

Managing multiple comorbidities is common in older adults. Thus, when a medication class, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, can potentially treat multiple conditions and prevent progression of chronic kidney disease, multiple guidelines must be followed when using these agents. The current article discusses risks and benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors, especially in the context of new evidence, and presents a case example. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48(10), 7-13.].

Interprofessional Education and Older Adults in the Shared Virtual Classroom: Lessons Learned During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The current article provides an overview of an interprofessional service-learning course that became virtual in the setting of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Telehealth video technologies were used to build an intergenerational, virtual classroom and increase engagement of older adults with interdisciplinary health professional students. The virtual classroom involved group health education sessions, individualized Medicare wellness visits, and a clinical huddle. The course addressed the public health need for reliable health information during the early days of the pandemic, social connection, and meeting the educational goals for health care students and older adults in a novel virtual setting. Lessons learned for the interdisciplinary team and for engaging older adults included the need for preparation reading, team building exercises, training videos, and telehealth competency checklists. Beyond the pandemic, adoption of virtual methods enables hybrid approaches to interprofessional education and builds competencies for delivery of telehealth and computer-based visits in professional practice settings. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48(8), 52-56.].

Racial Differences in Antidepressant Use in Nursing Facility Residents With Moderate to Severe Cognitive Impairment.

Objective To describe and compare the use of antidepressants between Black or African descent and White nursing facility residents with moderate to severe cognitive impairment. Design This was a secondary data analysis using baseline data from the Function and Behavior Focused Care for Nursing Facility Residents with Dementia randomized control trial. Setting Participants were recruited from 10 urban and two rural nursing facilities from Maryland. Methods Participants had to be 55 years of age or older, English-speaking, reside in long-term care at time of recruitment, and score a 15 or less on the Mini Mental-State Examination. A total of 336 residents participated at baseline. Data were collected by a research evaluator through observation, proxy report from staff caring for the resident the day of testing, and patient charts. Main Outcomes A significant difference of antidepressant use between Black or African descent and White nursing facility residents with moderate to severe cognitive impairment would be noted when controlling for depression, age, gender, functional status, agitation, and number of co-morbidities. Results In adjusted models, Black or African descent residents were less likely to be prescribed antidepressants compared with White residents. Conclusion Racial differences were noted regarding antidepressant use among nursing facility residents with moderate to severe cognitive impairment, but it is unknown if race could impact prescribing practices when indications for use are known. Further research is needed to ascertain if knowing the specific indications for use might contribute to racial disparities with antidepressant prescribing in nursing facility residents with moderate to severe cognitive impairment.

Evolution of the Comprehensive Medication Review Completion Rate for Medicare Part D Plans: What Do the Stars Tell Us?

Objective To describe changes in the Medicare Part D Comprehensive Medication Review (CMR) completion rate within the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Star Ratings program since its inception. Methods Publicly available information for Star Ratings years 2014 to 2021 was obtained from the CMS website and through indexed literature and internet searches. Data elements for the CMR completion measure were extracted for Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans (MA-PDs) and prescription drug plans (PDPs) and included the annual weighted value, cut-points for star rating, completion rates, and star achievement. Results In 2014 and 2015, the CMR completion rate was a display measure in the Star Ratings program with rates between 10 and 16%. This measure was added in 2016 with a weighted value of 1 that has remained the same. The cut-points when comparing 2016 with 2021 have increased from less than 13.6 to less than 48% for 1 star and 76 to 89% or more for 5 stars for MA-PDs and from less than 8.5 to less than 24% for 1 star and 36.7 to 61% or more for 5 stars for PDPs. From 2016 to 2021, the average Star Ratings for CMR completion increased from 2.3 to 3.7 for MA-PDs and 2.3 to 3.6 for PDPs. Conclusion Since the inception of the CMR completion rate as a quality measure, an increasing proportion of eligible beneficiaries has received a CMR with MA-PDs consistently providing this service to more beneficiaries than PDPs. The cut-points for star achievement have also risen, requiring higher CMR completion rates to achieve higher star ratings. Further evolution of the CMR quality measure is needed for improving medication management.

Opioid Use Disorder and Older Adults: Navigating Treatment Options.

The intent of the current article is to highlight via a case vignette challenges faced when managing pain across care transitions in an older adult with multiple comorbidities, including, but not limited to, opioid use disorder (OUD). This case will highlight the role of different medications for OUD, namely buprenorphine/naloxone, methadone, and naltrexone. Furthermore, the case illustrates medication-related considerations in addition to action steps that are needed when working with older adults. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48(7), 4-9.].

Senior Care Pharmacists, Audiologists, and Otologists: Improving Hearing Health for Older Patients Through Interprofessional Collaboration.

The purpose of this manuscript is to provide pharmacists with education on hearing loss that colleagues in audiology believe is most critical for pharmacists. As well as highlighting insightful interventions pharmacists can make in collaboration with hearing professionals, such as audiologists, otolaryngologists, and otologists, to improve patient care. This project was initiated by professional students at the University of Maryland in both Baltimore and College Park campuses, after completing the interprofessional elective course IPE Care in Geriatrics. Upon completion of the course, the authors performed an extensive literature search and reviewed publications pertaining to pharmacy, audiology, and their integration.Hearing loss can have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life. Older people are at an increased risk for experiencing hearing impairment, but often do not seek help from health care providers. Collaboration between audiologists, otolaryngologists, and pharmacists has the potential to improve patients' access to hearing health and break barriers for patients. Important interventions that pharmacists can make to better serve their patients with hearing loss include screening, enhancing communication, and hearing aid assistance. This article also provides guidance on identifying patients who would be candidates for over-the-counter hearing aids and patients who should be referred to a hearing professional. This skill will become increasingly relevant with the emergence of over-the-counter hearing aids.

Deficiency Citations on Inappropriate Psychotropics Use Related to Care for Behavioral Symptoms of Dementia.

OBJECTIVES: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) initiated the National Partnership to Improve Dementia Care in Nursing Homes in 2012, which helped decrease antipsychotics use. However, inappropriate use of antipsychotics and other psychotropic medications to control behavioral symptoms associated with dementia persists. Nursing homes (NHs) can be flagged for inappropriate psychotropics use as a deficiency of care citation (F-758 tag). The purpose of this study was to comprehensively explore inappropriate psychotropic medication use deficiency, F-758 citations, in caring for NH residents with dementia. DESIGN: A mixed-methods study was performed. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: During the first quarter of 2018 (January-March), 3526 NHs were surveyed, of which 642 received F-758 tags. Of the 642, the sample was confined to the 444 NHs that received the citation for the care of residents with dementia. Information on deficiencies was obtained from 2018 Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting data. Inspection reports for deficiencies were obtained from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Home Compare and ProPublica. METHODS: Quantitative analysis was used to examine the frequency of involved psychotropic medications, scope/severity of F-758 deficiency citations, and reasons for the citations. Reasons for F-758 citations by psychotropic medication categories and scope/severity of the citations were also examined using χ2 tests. Qualitative data analysis was conducted using content analysis with an inductive coding approach to summarize the inspection reports. RESULTS: Antipsychotics were the most involved drug category for F-758 tag citations. The 3 most common reasons for F-758 citations included failure to identify and/or monitor behavioral symptoms (178 NHs), attempt gradual drug reduction (131 NHs), and maintain 14-day limitations on Pro Re Nata (PRN) psychotropic orders (121 NHs). Compared with those with no involvement of antipsychotic drugs, facilities with antipsychotics-related F-758 tags had higher rates of failure to identify/monitor behavioral symptoms (P < .001), attempt gradual drug reduction (P < .001), and provide adequate indications for psychotropics use (P < .001). NHs with F-758 tags related to inappropriate antianxiety medication use had a higher prevalence of failure to maintain 14-day limitation on PRN orders (P < .001) and provide nonpharmacologic interventions (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study suggests areas for improvement that could potentially reduce inappropriate psychotropics use. Supporting quality of dementia care workforce and improving cooperation within healthcare staff and professionals are recommended to ensure proper nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions.

Nurse staffing and deficiency of care for inappropriate psychotropic medication use in nursing home residents with dementia.

PURPOSE: Psychotropic medications are used to manage behavioral symptoms of dementia in nursing homes despite limited efficacy and the risk of adverse effects, and may be considered an easier solution for the treatment of behavioral symptoms. However, non-pharmacologic interventions are preferable but are most effective with consistent staffing. To address this, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services implemented additional regulatory scrutiny through F-tag for deficiencies of care, targeting inappropriate psychotropic medication use (F-758 tag). The purpose of this study was to examine associations between nurse staffing levels and the occurrence of deficiency citations for inappropriate psychotropic medication use in residents with dementia symptoms. DESIGN: This was secondary data analysis of a cross-sectional study using CASPER (Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting) and PBJ (Payroll-Based Journal) data from 14,548 Medicare or Medicaid-certified facilities surveyed between December 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018. METHODS: Staffing measures included nursing hours per resident day and registered nurse skill-mix. Generalized linear mixed models with facilities nested within states, were used to estimate the magnitude of the associations between the occurrence of inappropriate psychotropics use deficiency citations and nurse staffing levels. Covariates included facility location, size, ownership, the presence of dementia special care units, and the proportion of residents with dementia, depression, psychiatric disorders, mental behavioral symptoms, and residents with Medicare/Medicaid. RESULTS: There were 1875 facilities with deficiency citations regarding inappropriate psychotropics use for residents with dementia. When controlling for covariates, facilities with greater hours per resident day for registered nurses (odds ratio [OR] = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.44-0.67), certified nursing assistants (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.77-0.99) and total nurse staff (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.79-0.96) had significantly lower odds of inappropriate psychotropics use deficiency citations. Nursing homes with greater registered nurse skill-mix had significantly lower odds of receiving the deficiency tags (OR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.04-0.26). CONCLUSION: Citations for inappropriate psychotropic medication use among residents with dementia were less likely to occur in facilities with higher staffing levels for registered nurses, certified nursing assistants, total nurse staff, and greater registered nurse skill-mix. Facilities need to be equipped with adequate nurse staffing levels to facilitate the use of non-pharmacological interventions and reduce inappropriate psychotropic medication use. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Adequate nursing staffing is associated with fewer deficiencies related to the use of psychotropic medications to treat behavioral symptoms. Nursing home administrators and policymakers need to focus on assuring adequate nurse staffing levels to provide safe and high-quality dementia care.

Post-acute long-term care COVID-19 medication optimization survey: Informing medication management initiatives.

The Medication Management Guide (MMG) provides guidance on strategies to optimize medication management in PA-LTC and simplify administration to reduce the transmission risk of COVID-19. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the utility of the MMG, determine the barriers and facilitators of the MMG implementation in PALTC sites to help inform future research and initiatives. Individuals who accessed MMG during the pandemic (April 2020-March 2021) were contacted to elicit feedback on this tool via an online survey. The survey response rate was 7.7% (156/2,018) after three rounds of emails. Respondents consisted of 31% (n=49) pharmacists, 27% (n=42) physicians, 11% (n=18) nurses, and 12% (n=19) nurse practitioners. The "Other" respondents (11%, n=17) included dieticians (n=4), physician assistants (n=3), pharmacy technicians (n=3), students (n=1), consultants (n=1), and educators (n=2). From these respondents, 77% (n=122) took tactics to optimize medications at their facilities during COVID-19.